About The Award
Submissions Open
March 9, 2026
Submission Deadline
April 26, 2026
Shortlist Announcement
May 11, 2026
Result Announcement
May 17, 2026
At Lumiere Education, we believe that curiosity drives progress. When young scholars are given the chance to ask bold questions, gather evidence, and share what they discover, they sharpen their thinking, improve their communication, and create ideas that can move society forward.
The Lumiere Scholars Essay Award invites high school students to examine issues that matter to them, cross disciplinary lines, test assumptions, and defend their arguments with rigorous evidence. Essay entries are reviewed by our Academic Advisory Committee, an international panel of distinguished professors and researchers.
6 winners (1 Gold, 2 Silvers, 3 Bronzes) will share more than $11,000 in cash prizes and scholarships.
Free to enter and open worldwide, the award celebrates rising thinkers, sparks dialogue about the ideas shaping our future, and continues Lumiere's mission of empowering the next generation of researchers.
2026 Spring Awards
Bronze
(3 recipients)
$200 cash award
$1,350 Scholarship to any Lumiere Research Scholars Program
Academic Advisory Committee


Dr. Sergii Strelchuk
Associate Professor, University of Oxford


Dr. Charles Walcott
Professor Emeritus, Cornell University


Dr. Shana Cohen
Affiliated Lecturer, University of Cambridge


Dr. Andrew Simon
Senior Lecturer, Dartmouth University


Dr. Brenda Rubenstein
Associate Professor, Brown University


Dr. Klaus Okkenhaug
Professor, University of Cambridge


Dr. Justin Tyler Clark
Senior Lecturer, Cornell University


Dr. Samir Soneji
Principal Biostatistician, Duke University


Dr. Sergei Chernyshenko
Professor, Imperial College London


Dr. Bruce McLaren
Professor, Carnegie Mellon University


Dr. Kimberly Rose Clark
Lecturer, Dartmouth College


Dr. Robert Lyon
Associate Professor, New York University
2026 Essay Prompts
Participants can choose ONE of the following prompts.
Prompt contributed by
Dr. Samir Soneji


In a modern democracy, what responsibilities do citizens have to question economic and political systems — and what happens when people stop asking difficult questions?
Professor Commentary:
In Plato's The Apology of Socrates, Socrates claimed that "the unexamined life is not worth living." In a modern democracy, what responsibilities do citizens have to question economic and political systems? What happens when people stop asking difficult questions?
Can AI and organ cultures replace the need for experiments using animals?
Professor Commentary:
The age of animal experiments may be waning. For decades, animal testing has been the cornerstone of biomedical research — helping develop vaccines, treatments, and surgical techniques that have saved millions of lives. But advances in artificial intelligence and lab-grown organ cultures (organoids) are raising a new question: are animal experiments still necessary? Proponents of AI and organ cultures argue that these technologies can model human biology more accurately than animal subjects, at lower cost and without ethical concerns. Critics caution that biological complexity cannot yet be fully replicated in silico or in vitro, and that premature abandonment of animal models could slow medical progress. Where does the evidence point — and what should guide science's next steps?
Prompt contributed by
Dr. Klaus Okkenhaug


Prompt contributed by
Dr. Bruce McLaren


In the new age of Generative AI, what are the most important impacts on education?
Professor Commentary:
Generative AI is rapidly reshaping how students access information, complete assignments, and receive feedback, often in ways that outpace existing educational policies and practices. At the same time, schools and universities are grappling with questions about assessment, academic integrity, equity, and the evolving role of teachers in AI-rich learning environments. Against this backdrop of both promise and disruption, it is critical to ask: In the new age of GenAI, what do you see as the most important impacts on education?
Which problem of turbulence is the great problem of turbulence?
Professor Commentary:
In 1932, Sir Horace Lamb famously said: "I am an old man now, and when I die and go to heaven there are two matters on which I hope for enlightenment. One is quantum electrodynamics, and the other is the turbulent motion of fluids." In the early 1960s, Richard Feynman echoed the sentiment, calling turbulence "the most important unsolved problem of classical physics." For them, the goal may have been clear — yet no one knew how to achieve it. Turbulence research today pursues many different goals, and the difficulties encountered along the way are often described as the turbulence problem. The 2025 paper "What is the turbulence problem, and when may we regard it as solved?" by K. R. Sreenivasan and J. Schumacher lists several such formulations — but not all. Explore and decide: which problem of turbulence is truly the great one?
Prompt contributed by
Dr. Sergei Chernyshenko


Prompt contributed by
Dr. Samir Soneji


If every person possesses intrinsic worth, does society have a moral duty to reduce poverty and inequality?
Professor Commentary:
In Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant argued that every human being possesses intrinsic worth. He wrote: "So act that you use humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never merely as a means." Kant believed that people should never be treated simply as tools for profit, political advantage, or economic productivity. Instead, each person must be respected as a rational being with inherent dignity. Today, economic systems often measure value in terms of income, output, or efficiency. Some argue that poverty and inequality are unfortunate but inevitable outcomes of markets. Others believe that allowing extreme inequality means treating some people as expendable or less valuable. If Kant is correct that every person must be treated as an "end in themselves," does society have a moral duty to reduce poverty and inequality? What would it mean to design economic policies — such as taxation, wages, healthcare, or education — around the idea of equal human dignity?
Submission Deadline: April 26th, 2026
Judging Criteria
At Lumiere, essays are evaluated with our proprietary rubric. The judging panel comprises esteemed professors and researchers from Oxford, Cambridge, Brown, Dartmouth, and Cornell, engaging in a double-blind review process. Our system is designed to eliminate biases related to an author’s identity, affiliation, or reputation.
The strongest essays show intellectual independence and persuasive arguments that can change a thoughtful reader’s mind. Submissions that ignore major counterarguments or fail to engage meaningfully with opposing perspectives are unlikely to succeed.
The award seeks well-reasoned, research-based argumentative essays rather than original research papers. Participants are not expected to perform primary data collection or advanced data analysis to submit.
Originality
A distinct viewpoint and fresh insights
Analysis
A thorough understanding of the subject, supported by strong arguments.
Evidence
Well-substantiated arguments using credible, integrated sources.
Structure
Logical organization, clear progression of ideas, and smooth transitions.
Presentation
Meticulously edited, formal, grammatically correct, and precisely worded academic writing.
Guidelines & Eligibility
General Guidelines
Free entry
There are no fees required to enter this essay award. It is open to all eligible participants without cost.
Single Submission
Participants may submit only one essay.
Original Scholarship & Sole Authorship
1. Each essay must be the original work of the participant.
2. While participants may seek feedback or engage in discussion, the writing must be conducted entirely by the student. No joint or collaborative submission is permitted.
3. The use of external writing services is strictly prohibited.
Academic Integrity
1. Plagiarism in any form will result in disqualification.
2. All referenced material must be appropriately cited, and essays must reflect the participant’s original thought and expression.
3. Each participant must provide the email address of an academic referee who is acquainted with their academic work (a school teacher or counselor). Lumiere may contact referees directly to confirm the authenticity and originality of the submitted essays.
Format & Style
Language
Essays must be in English.
Academic
Essays must be academic and use formal language. Students may not use personal anecdotes to substantiate their arguments.
The award seeks well-reasoned, research-based argumentative essays rather than original research papers. Participants are not expected to perform primary data collection or advanced data analysis to submit.
Word Limit
Essays must not exceed 2,000 words, excluding footnotes and bibliography.
Citation Format
Essays must follow the Modern Language Association (MLA) 8th edition citation style.
For further reference, please consult this MLA 8 citation guide.
Eligibility
The competition is open to all students from any country who will be enrolled in high school (as of December 31, 2026). The submission must be in English and not exceed 2,000 words.
Current scholars or alums of the Lumiere Research Scholars Programs are welcome to apply, but may not submit their final Lumiere paper.
Submission Deadline: 11:59 PM Easter Standard Time on April 26th, 2026
Frequently asked questions
2025 Winners
2nd place
Lê Anh Khoa
(Humanities)
Vivian Foutz
(Social Sciences)
Janvi Kothari
(STEM)
1st Place
Kmar Asmi
(Humanities)
Swasti Sahoo
(Social Sciences)
Ridaa Mittal
(STEM)






